|Creators:||Faure Walker, James|
The term ‘digital drawing’ may imply a special kind of drawing, set against a natural approach. Previous generations also had to adjust to the new technologies of the time. Some resisted, some went ahead.
New methods present difficulties as well as opportunities. The how-to-draw books of the 1900’s show not just one ‘traditional’ approach, but a wide range, and a healthy debate. For the past two centuries such books have here and there discussed both drawing machines, and the connected question of how to draw machines. One way or another the world of drawing will absorb the impact of computers, and it won’t be just as an isolated genre of slightly weird drawing. So it is wrong to exclude ‘digital’ drawing from surveys, to think of this category as distinct from mainstream drawing. Museums have already collected the significant works, and traced the history. The way forward should be to integrate digital tools within the broad spectrum of drawing types.
There are no good reasons for not using digital devices, and no good reasons for not using pencils. All the same, I cite three cases where a pencil and paper technique would not be up to the job: football, a drawing jam session, and astronomy.
|Type of Research:||Article|
|Additional Information (Publicly available):|
One of a series of articles/chapters I have published since 2008 on drawing, which should form part of a forthcoming book.
|Keywords/subjects not otherwise listed:||digital, machines|
|Publisher/Broadcaster/Company:||School of the Arts, Loughborough University|
|Your affiliations with UAL:||Colleges > Camberwell College of Arts|
|Date:||01 January 2011|
|Projects or Series:||Research Outputs Review (April 2010 - April 2011)|
|Deposited By:||Jim Faure Walker|
|Deposited On:||14 Feb 2012 11:28|
|Last Modified:||23 May 2013 22:37|