Hinrichs-Krapels, S. and Bailey, Jocelyn and Boulding, H. and Duffy, B. and Hesketh, R. and Kinloch, E. and Pollitt, A. and Rawlings, S. and van Rij, A. and Wilkinson, B. and Pow, R. and Grant, J. (2020) Using Policy Labs as a process to bring evidence closer to public policymaking: a guide to one approach. Palgrave Communications, 6 (101).
Using Policy Labs as a process to bring evidence closer to public policymaking: a guide to one approach (857kB) |
Type of Research: | Article |
---|---|
Creators: | Hinrichs-Krapels, S. and Bailey, Jocelyn and Boulding, H. and Duffy, B. and Hesketh, R. and Kinloch, E. and Pollitt, A. and Rawlings, S. and van Rij, A. and Wilkinson, B. and Pow, R. and Grant, J. |
Description: | While robust evidence is one ingredient in the policymaking process, it is by no means the only one. Engaging with policymakers and the policymaking process requires collaborative working models, navigating through the experiences, values and perspectives of policymakers and other stakeholders, as well as communicating evidence in an accessible manner. As a response to these requirements, over recent years there has been proliferation of activities that engage producers of evidence (specifically, academics), policymakers, practitioners, and the public in policy formulation, implementation and evaluation. In this article, we describe one engagement approach for facilitating research evidence uptake into policy and practice—an activity called a ‘Policy Lab’—as conducted by the team at The Policy Institute at King’s College London on numerous policy challenges over the past four years. Drawing on our experience in running 15 Policy Labs between January 2015 and September 2019, we (a) provide a guide to how we have run Policy Labs, while sharing our learning on what has worked best in conducting them and (b) demonstrate how these labs can contribute to bringing evidence closer to policymaking, by comparing their characteristics to enablers for doing so identified in the literature. While this approach to Policy Labs is not the only one of its kind, we suggest that these types of Labs manifest characteristics identified in previous studies for influencing the policymaking process; namely: providing a forum for open, honest conversations around a policy topic; creating new networks, collaborations and partnerships between academics and policymakers; synthesising available evidence on a policy topic in a robust and accessible format; and providing timely access to evidence relevant to a policy issue. We recognise the limitations of measuring and evaluating how these Labs change policy in the long-term and recommend viewing the Policy Lab as part of a process for engaging evidence and policymaking and not an isolated activity. This process serves to build a coalition through participation of diverse communities (thereby establishing ‘trust’), work on the language and presentation of evidence (thereby enabling effective ‘translation’ of evidence) and engage policymakers early to respond when policy windows emerge (thereby taking into account ‘timing’ for creating policy action). |
Keywords/subjects not otherwise listed: | Policy Labs |
Your affiliations with UAL: | Research Centres/Networks > Social Design Institute |
Date: | 1 June 2020 |
Digital Object Identifier: | 10.1057/s41599-020-0453-0 |
Date Deposited: | 02 Oct 2020 09:40 |
Last Modified: | 03 Dec 2020 20:47 |
Item ID: | 16004 |
URI: | https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/16004 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page | University Staff: Request a correction