Davis, Aaron and Wallace, Niki and Gwilt, Ian and Tuckey, Michelle (2022) Valuing Processes and Outcomes: A framework for planning co-design in complex systems of health design. In: Enabling health, care and well-being through design research, 22-24 August 2022, The Netherlands.
Valuing Processes and Outcomes: A framework for planning co-design in complex systems of health design (606kB) |
Type of Research: | Conference, Symposium or Workshop Item |
---|---|
Creators: | Davis, Aaron and Wallace, Niki and Gwilt, Ian and Tuckey, Michelle |
Description: | Purpose: This paper sets out a framework for planning co-design processes for complex systemsbased projects typical in healthcare settings. Background: Healthcare systems and environments are complex. Innovation often requires the redesign of physical spaces or objects, social processes, and the complex associated layers of service systems. Co-design is an established methodology for catalysing innovation in products and services because the scope is often well-defined but can be more challenging when working in systems where complexity impacts boundary definition. Co-design uses interdisciplinary and multi-level engagement with diverse stakeholders to catalyse innovation at the intersection between disciplines, experiences, and knowledge sets. The evaluation of these processes often utilises control over decisionmaking as a defacto measure of participation quality, reflecting potential for stakeholders to influence key outcomes. Yet there are also practical and theoretical reasons to value well-designed participatory processes in their own right. Methods: The framework presented in this paper combines the evaluation of participation in codesign processes and in decision-making as two distinctive activities, applied to real-world and hypothetical case studies that demonstrate the potential of this framework as a transparent planning and evaluation tool. Results: The framework allows participation to be planned and valued independently without defaulting to control over decision-making processes as the (only) valued option. The case studies demonstrate its potential in structuring a range of collaborative processes that suit different types of system innovation. Conclusions: The formalisation of a framework for planning co-design activities that values participation in co-design processes in parallel with participation in decision-making provides a more transparent and beneficial way to structure co-design for complex systems-based challenges that recognises the humans at the heart of co-design. |
Keywords/subjects not otherwise listed: | Co-Design |
Your affiliations with UAL: | Colleges > Camberwell College of Arts Colleges > Chelsea College of Arts |
Date: | 22 August 2022 |
Event Location: | The Netherlands |
Date Deposited: | 09 Oct 2024 15:47 |
Last Modified: | 09 Oct 2024 15:47 |
Item ID: | 22688 |
URI: | https://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/id/eprint/22688 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page | University Staff: Request a correction